Dell XPS 8300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemDell XPS 8300  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0Y2MRG
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 07:03
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2600-$236
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.7% Average
1-Core 83
2-Core 128
52% 105 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 382
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 434
29% 434 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2014) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.67% Terrible
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 23
7% 24.6 fps
MRender 18.1
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 20.2
6% 19.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.67%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 236 219 182 184 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 436
Mixed 357
SusWrite 222
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 48.9
161% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 125%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$69
335GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 99 115 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 2.8
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 104
21% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
240GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 146 145 144 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 68.5
Write 115
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 146
65% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
382% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical XPS 8300 Builds (Compare 5,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 8300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $291
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback