| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 870-260na (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 82F1 |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161110 |
| Uptime | 4.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 08 '19 at 01:59 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53%
Above average
|
63% 118 Pts
|
42% 303 Pts
|
20% 330 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.5%
Average
|
43% 54.4 fps
|
50% 61.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 64 67 47 62 MB/s
|
28% 127 MB/s
|
18% 5.93 MB/s
| ||
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
485GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 115 113 145 142 150 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
84% 114 MB/s
|
112% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
34%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
27% 9.53 GB/s
|
24% 163 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 870-260na Builds (Compare 24 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 870-260na
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $214 |