Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131112
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 22:58
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 148
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 440
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.2
37% 43 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 36.6
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 96 96 70 65 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 205
Write 216
Mixed 177
SusWrite 77.6
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 28.8
97% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 34.5
30% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 97%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
851GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 189 203 207 206 208 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.9% Good
Read 229
Write 216
Mixed 218
SusWrite 191
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 39
119% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 45.7
37% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
17GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 101 98 71 66 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.6% Above average
Read 229
Write 213
Mixed 205
SusWrite 80
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 37.8
122% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 42.8
34% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
90GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 95
Write 94.7
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 84.3
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 60%
USB Flash Memory 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.1 6.1 6.1 5.9 6.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 15
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.9
8% 7.28 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback