Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '19 at 16:07
Run Duration	289 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Memory 82.3 1-Core 155 2-Core 304 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 968 96% 783 Pts	64-Core 1,431 89% 1,431 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.22 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Lighting 85.2 Reflection 46.6 Parallax 55.1 69% 62.3 fps	MRender 55.6 Gravity 84.5 Splatting 78.1 60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 551 465 424 501 503 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 1,524 Write 1,524 Mixed 1,262 SusWrite 515 270% 1,206 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 13.6 38% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 268 192% 246 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 340%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 9GB free Firmware: Z22000RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 456 Write 204 Mixed 200 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 11.6 59% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 74 82% 137 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 5GB free Firmware: 070H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 445 Write 242 Mixed 259 70% 316 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 14.5 74% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 22.9 42% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 77.4 Write 78.3 Mixed 53 52% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	99.5% Outstanding	MC Read 41 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 40.4 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 27 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 38.6 87% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 134%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16