Asus N552VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus N552VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N552VX
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 15:30
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.1% Good
1-Core 105
2-Core 199
72% 152 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 513
54% 425 Pts
64-Core 508
34% 508 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1C9D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 18.6
5% 25.1 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 26.8
5% 20.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HFS512G39MND-3510A 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20400P00
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 425
Write 345
Mixed 334
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 29.1
82% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 288
233% 329 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 102%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
476GB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 93.8
Write 24.2
Mixed 57
44% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical N552VX Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 46%
Workstation 30%

System: Asus N552VX

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback