PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 1.62% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro Super Server (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X11DPL-i |
Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190304 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 07 '19 at 14:34 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU:
CPU1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
|
68.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSSD-S6B240CG3VX 240GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 24 22 22 24 MB/s
|
1.62%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 148 146 145 154 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 25x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 22x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 22x |
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $618 |