Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 133%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 12:38
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
1-Core 139
2-Core 273
97% 206 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 849
89% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,310
88% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$400
MSI(1462 C755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3741 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 400
Reflection 333
Parallax 461
105% 398 fps
MRender 399
Gravity 279
Splatting 247
90% 308 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 107%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 642 375 398 383 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,363
Write 1,922
Mixed 1,375
SusWrite 499
342% 1,540 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 81.2
279% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,134
830% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 258%
Great: 289%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$60
418GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 461 461 462 440 358 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 171 167 187 173 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 176
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 171
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
669GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 77 75 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 80.2
Write 83.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 75.1
97% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34%
Great: 65%
ST1000LM024 HN-M 1TB
251GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 40 38 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 36.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 37.4
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.2
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 34
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 5,956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 131%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,080
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback