Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 12:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.4% Above average
1-Core 81
2-Core 170
59% 126 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 496
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 498
33% 498 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$700
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 334
Reflection 330
Parallax 476
88% 380 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 349
Splatting 203
99% 282 fps
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 132%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1A58 674F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 19.9
5% 20.6 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 31.8
6% 23.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 509 447 377 356 344 329 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 826
Write 537
Mixed 394
SusWrite 394
120% 538 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 40.7
161% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 580
465% 659 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 137%
Great: 173%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
92GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 21 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 35.2
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 22
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.2
136% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 67%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6 7 7.3 7.3 6.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Read 17
Write 10.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 6.8
15% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
87% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 10%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
236GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 20.6
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 22.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 3,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback