HP p6-2000ukm

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2000ukm  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 11:32
Run Duration485 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 134
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 191
28% 203 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2ABF) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2932
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1
1% 1.19 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 29 434 256 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
531GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.4 69 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 66.3
Write 65.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 22.6
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 76%
TDK LoR TF10 4GB
3GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 3.6 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Read 15
Write 0.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 1.6
5% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 5%
Samsung S2 Portable 640GB
409GB free, PID 1f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 28 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 10.4
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2000ukm Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2000ukm

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback