Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J2900 4,259 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 37.5 1-Core 8.8 2-Core 21.1 17% 22.5 Pts	4-Core 50.6 8-Core 61.7 7% 56.2 Pts	64-Core 70.6 4% 70.6 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B28) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 1 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 481GB free Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 835 Write 13.2 Mixed 16.2 206% 288 MB/s	4K Read 100 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 4,286% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA7C0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 171 Write 164 Mixed 37.2 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 2,535 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 10GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 7.2 5.7 6.4 5.8 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	7.91% Terrible	Read 38 Write 2.2 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 5.9 13% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.91% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 3.2 6% 2.23 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16