Medion Erazer X7841 MD99686

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer X7841 MD99686  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RE1M
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '16 at 13:23
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 90.6
48% 73 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 177
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 6780) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7595
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 41
Parallax 36
35% 39.9 fps
MRender 43.5
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 37
32% 40 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
698GB free
Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 462
Write 323
Mixed 330
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 22.6
88% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 46.7
92% 188 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 104%
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 480
Write 125
Mixed 200
58% 268 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 9.16
67% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 28.2
42% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
909GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 102
Mixed 94.3
74% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF Kingston 9905668-001.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7841 MD99686 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7841 MD99686

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback