Lenovo 20G9S05P00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20G9S05P00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Intel powered classmate PC
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3150
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 40.9
1-Core 25.6
2-Core 51
26% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 104
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 102
7% 102 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT23L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 126 128 130 133 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 404
Write 130
Mixed 129
SusWrite 130
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 17.6
55% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 114
96% 141 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 107%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
25GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 8.6 11 7.2 10 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 8.7
11% 9.73 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 10%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 20G9S05P00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20G9S05P00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback