Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '19 at 19:26
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 109 2-Core 215 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 390 55% 408 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2067 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 73.9 Reflection 76.4 Parallax 73.9 60% 74.7 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 71.4 58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 106 95 100 100 100 MB/s Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.1% Good	Read 272 Write 152 Mixed 175 SusWrite 99.7 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 97.3 4K Mixed 38.3 144% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 82.4 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 110 83% 110 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 75%
Samsung MZ7LF192HCGS-000L1 192GB 1,857 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 64GB free Firmware: FXT03L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 167 167 169 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 464 Write 161 Mixed 183 SusWrite 167 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 24.8 99% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 47 DQ Mixed 61.1 57% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 850GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 157 157 158 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 146 Write 101 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 157 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x16GB 3,191 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2460 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 27.4 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 21.7 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	267x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	265x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	288x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,232

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16