Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 17:13
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4790-$317
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.6% Good
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
68% 142 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 455
51% 391 Pts
64-Core 447
30% 447 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,090
Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
173% Outstanding
Lighting 418
Reflection 512
Parallax 766
110% 565 fps
MRender 532
Gravity 624
Splatting 298
177% 485 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 173%
Great: 195%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$108
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 462 482 507 512 507 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 645
Write 512
Mixed 530
SusWrite 475
121% 541 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 57.4
191% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 588
444% 599 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 141%
Great: 334%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$44
70GB free
Firmware: MKAOA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 96 98 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 127
Write 120
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 99.4
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$95
13GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 132 129 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 119
Mixed 108
SusWrite 129
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 84%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$80
15GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 73 74 72 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 74
Write 76.3
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 73.3
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 64%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
84GB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 74 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 70.3
Write 66.2
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 72.6
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 83%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$95
2GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 92.5
Write 86.5
Mixed 82.2
66% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 84%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 2,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $802
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback