Casper Excalibur G5K

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Casper Excalibur G5K (all builds)
Motherboard	Casper Excalibur G5K
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160707
Uptime	10.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	61%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 102 48% 76.4 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 279 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 1501) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7212 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 1.34 1% 4.71 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 50 51 49 49 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 444 Write 46.8 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 49.2 33% 153 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 17.4 68% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 21.8 DQ Mixed 33.3 41% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 814GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 89 91 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 88.5 Mixed 32 SusWrite 90.2 55% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 2x8GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 19.7 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Excalibur G5K Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Casper Excalibur G5K

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	37x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	30x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	26x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	4x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 73%, 670 samples	35x
CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 273 samples	17x
CT8G4SFS8213.M8FA 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 199 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16