Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 09:52
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 69
2-Core 138
54% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 540
48% 408 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.6
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 493 393 358 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 541
Write 552
Mixed 513
SusWrite 312
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 36
123% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 421
316% 422 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 144%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$92
1.5TB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 179 179 181 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 214
Mixed 111
SusWrite 176
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
412% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 154 154 155 155 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 150
Write 166
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 152
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87%
Great: 112%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$92
1.5TB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 106 113 114 112 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 184
Write 225
Mixed 122
SusWrite 113
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
429% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 108%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$92
929GB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 157 157 158 158 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 204
Mixed 108
SusWrite 156
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
355% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 108%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$92
1.5TB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 187 190 189 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 225
Mixed 124
SusWrite 184
132% 179 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
454% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 46.7
146% 51.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 124%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback