| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 8.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080409 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 06 '19 at 07:05 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
39.6%
Below average
|
40% 61.5 Pts
|
10% 75.1 Pts
|
5% 79.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
MSI(1462 2360) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 980 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
8.76%
Terrible
|
8% 8.71 fps
|
10% 11.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 92 97 96 103 102 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
29% 132 MB/s
|
70% 22.4 MB/s
|
26% 34.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.5%
Very poor
|
10% 3.33 GB/s
|
8% 2.63 GB/s
|
37% 108 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,561 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 707x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 278x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 263x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 614x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |