Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '16 at 05:25
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 96.2
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 180
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 338
40% 311 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 5.56
3% 4.84 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 6.48
5% 5.59 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 3%
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.11.4
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 77.7
49% 68.3 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 55.6
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Toshiba MK1652GSX 160GB-$30
141GB free
Firmware: LV010M Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 61.3
Mixed 60.5
45% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 34%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 104
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.35
139% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 32GB
30GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.41
12% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.56
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.83
80% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 15.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 53.3
75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $674
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback