Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	6.42% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba dynabook R731/38C (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '19 at 04:46
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Memory 21 1-Core 30.5 2-Core 43.3 19% 31.6 Pts	4-Core 70.3 8-Core 73 10% 71.7 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0005) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.56% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.12 1% 1.81 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 3 2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.56% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GMLJ 128GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJTA0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 11 8.2 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.42% Terrible	Read 111 Write 4.7 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 10.6 7% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 5% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 6.42% Great: 38%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 25GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 6.5 Mixed 1.7 4% 4.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 313 13% 313 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16