Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-K (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '19 at 19:08
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 80.9 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 122 56% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 206 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.81% Terrible	Lighting 9.47 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 14.3 8% 11.1 fps	MRender 7.81 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 10.3 8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.81% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240-LE 240GB 549 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 8.6 29 45 17 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 446 Write 320 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 59.5 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 0.4 34% 9.53 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 8.5 DQ Mixed 1 6% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 76%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41 8,190 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 295GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 81 100 101 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 97.4 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 24GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.5 4.3 2.4 6.2 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Read 18 Write 8.3 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.7 10% 9.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.1 56% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.5% Below average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 16.5 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.8 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	79x
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples	76x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	58x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	68x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	115x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	63x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16