Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook S15 X510UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UF
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 05 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.6% Very good
1-Core 120
2-Core 230
83% 175 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 575
61% 477 Pts
64-Core 547
37% 547 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1131) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4108
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 29.5
8% 28.1 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 20
9% 25.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 411 400 417 421 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 465
Write 330
Mixed 259
SusWrite 402
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 28.1
114% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 61
DQ Mixed 77.7
62% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 116%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
291GB free
Firmware: SBFA13.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 301 132 112 114 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 344
Write 147
Mixed 230
SusWrite 184
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 11.4
64% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 25.6
33% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 99%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
245GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.6% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 40.1
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 14.8
7% 33 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 15.9
51% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 24.2
DQ Mixed 24.6
18% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 78%
Toshiba THNSNK128GVN8 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: 3203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.8% Very poor
Read 40.1
Write 37.4
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 14.3
7% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 11
38% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.5
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 13.3
10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 74%
Lacie P9227 Slim 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 36.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 13.9
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ BL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: A905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 40
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 41.3
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 65%
USB30 2TB
789GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 41 44 45 44 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 31
Write 39.4
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 41.6
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
173% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate USB 1TB
931GB free, PID a014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 29.3
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 38.8
41% 30 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFD824A.M16FF 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook S15 X510UF Builds (Compare 1,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback