MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191027
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 15:50
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 668
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB; Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Pulse ITX 4GB 1244MHz (11266-34)
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 63
Parallax 75.2
48% 65.7 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 51.5
46% 56.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST480FP0021 480GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B770
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 368 410 403 416 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 448
Mixed 356
SusWrite 401
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 34
121% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 217
195% 296 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 99%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
11GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 92 90 80 71 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 478
Write 110
Mixed 155
SusWrite 83.9
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 15.8
101% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 29.3
43% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
398GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 77 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 120
Write 104
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 76
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 74%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
923GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 35 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 88.8
Write 48.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 36.5
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
373GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 83 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 111
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 82.5
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 34.5
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 28.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $527
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback