Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 13:21
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8370-$153
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.9% Above average
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 161
57% 121 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 494
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 500
34% 500 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 83.9
17% 73 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 64.1
16% 56.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$57
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 93 91 111 107 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 112
Write 75.3
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 98.7
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
155% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D21BCT1.16FN 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 8,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $643
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback