Asus H110M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '19 at 11:09
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 383 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.5% Average	Lighting 54.7 Reflection 61 Parallax 51.6 45% 55.8 fps	MRender 58.8 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 61.8 44% 53.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 76 11 38 40 8.2 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.6% Very poor	Read 162 Write 85.8 Mixed 79 SusWrite 44.1 20% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 6.6 25% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 18.5 DQ Write 18.5 DQ Mixed 15.1 12% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 123GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 49.2 Write 47 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 49.6 32% 43.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 21 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 21.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	414x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	238x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	283x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	218x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	193x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	81x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	57x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16