Biostar A10N-8800E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-8800E  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 04:54
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 64.5
27% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 70.6
8-Core 116
11% 93.1 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1C40) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 11.5
5% 8.32 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 9.07
Splatting 5.87
5% 6.41 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 357 369 394 408 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 394
Write 299
Mixed 355
SusWrite 358
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 24.4
83% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 221
157% 201 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
23GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 8.6 7.3 5.4 9.1 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 141
Write 39.2
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 11
68% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.9
160% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 125GB
60GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8.4 12 8.4 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 19.4
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 10.9
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.1
123% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB
27GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 12 22 15 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 7.4
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 16.1
21% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 24%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
19GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 42 23 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 132
Write 75.4
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 37.3
89% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
118% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 3 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.4% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-8800E Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-8800E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback