| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190715 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 03 '19 at 19:20 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.3%
Excellent
|
87% 156 Pts
|
70% 545 Pts
|
44% 710 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97
|
45%
Average
|
48% 53.7 fps
|
40% 48.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 295 297 297 298 299 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
86% 382 MB/s
|
179% 61.9 MB/s
|
205% 307 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
151GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 65 64 65 66 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
32% 44 MB/s
|
93% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78.6%
Very good
|
80% 28.1 GB/s
|
65% 22.6 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,270 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 1,616x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,217x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 177x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 832x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 481x |
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 429x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 102% - Outstanding | Total price: $438 |