ECS A55F2-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardECS A55F2-M3  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 17:09
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.6% Below average
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 109
41% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 177
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 208
14% 208 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$135
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 135
Reflection 127
Parallax 166
36% 143 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 119
Splatting 86.1
34% 103 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 41 49 52 46 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 23.8
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 47.6
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 77%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
20GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 14 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 24
Write 17.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 15.5
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 20%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB
186GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 21
SusWrite 16.4
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.9
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 38%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A55F2-M3 Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A55F2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $36
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback