Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom 330 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U1PR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 34.6 1-Core 5.5 2-Core 8.8 14% 16.3 Pts	4-Core 14.1 8-Core 22.1 2% 18.1 Pts	64-Core 22 1% 22 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 27%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 60 66 63 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 154 Write 76.9 Mixed 90.1 SusWrite 65 21% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 11.7 41% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 54.2 DQ Mixed 31.6 27% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 69%
Maxtor 6B200M0 204GB-$81 1,170 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 81GB free Firmware: BANC1B10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 55 62 62 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 61.6 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 60.5 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.7 171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.47% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.43 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.1 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 229 17% 229 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.47% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16