Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180914
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 105 2-Core 195 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 424 55% 416 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.9% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 64.1 57% 68.9 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 63 54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 271 287 282 293 280 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2GB free Firmware: 5.0.7b Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 364 Write 127 Mixed 169 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 26 104% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 114 96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 80%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 21GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 97 57 4 28 3 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 401 Write 300 Mixed 250 SusWrite 67 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 5.7 50% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 24.8 35% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 8GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 44 46 42 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 27.9 Write 39.3 Mixed 31 SusWrite 41.9 26% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 69%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 10GB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 15 18 19 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 84.7 Write 83 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 17.7 43% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 53%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4GB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 15 19 19 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.02% Terrible	Read 10 Write 19.2 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 17.7 11% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 8.02% Great: 51%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65 1,900 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 14GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 67 71 71 70 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 77.8 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 67.5 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 8GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 56 51 52 55 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 47.7 Write 52.3 Mixed 55 SusWrite 52.1 39% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 29GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 91 94 87 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 110 Write 108 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 90.5 71% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 83%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 11.2 Write 20 Mixed 12.3 20% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 55%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 6GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 240 Write 230 Mixed 226 297% 232 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 21.3 1,620% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 27.8 2,345% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 227%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB-$74 9,729 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 26.5 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 22.2 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	676x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	302x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	196x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	145x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $709

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16