Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-8100-$120
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.7% Good
1-Core 100
2-Core 180
67% 140 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 346
49% 354 Pts
64-Core 338
23% 338 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$271
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 210
Reflection 188
Parallax 205
55% 201 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 200
Splatting 145
55% 162 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$73
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 271 287 282 293 280 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 129%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
2GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7b
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 364
Write 127
Mixed 169
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 26
104% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 114
96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
21GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 97 57 4 28 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 401
Write 300
Mixed 250
SusWrite 67
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 5.7
50% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 24.8
35% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$35
8GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 44 46 42 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 27.9
Write 39.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 41.9
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 69%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
10GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 15 18 19 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 84.7
Write 83
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 17.7
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 53%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
4GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 15 19 19 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 10
Write 19.2
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 17.7
11% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 51%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$240
14GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 67 71 71 70 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 77.8
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 67.5
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$87
8GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 56 51 52 55 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 52.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 52.1
39% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 68%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
29GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 91 94 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 90.5
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 83%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
0GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 11.2
Write 20
Mixed 12.3
20% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 51%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
6GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 240
Write 230
Mixed 226
297% 232 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 21.3
1,620% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 38.7
DQ Mixed 27.8
2,345% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 288%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB-$130
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 4,121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,083
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback