Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 12:50
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 258
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 702
71% 563 Pts
64-Core 944
63% 944 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$338
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.4% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 116
Parallax 108
96% 114 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 101
Splatting 83
86% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 96%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7500Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1256 629 638 731 668 684 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 726
Write 1,272
Mixed 508
SusWrite 768
185% 818 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 47.1
153% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 491
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 381
287% 388 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 141%
Great: 317%
Hitachi TOURO S 1TB
886GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 42 40 43 40 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 75%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 16TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 55 53 54 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 225
Write 180
Mixed 57
SusWrite 53.9
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
267% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 112%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 56 53 54 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 109%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 02a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 103 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 104
121% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 50%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 3TB
158GB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 122 126 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 140
Write 109
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 125
147% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 9905678-012.A00G 9905701-132.A00G 9905701-020.A00G 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 24.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,490
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i3-10100F $120Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback