Acer AOHAPPY2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive13% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemAcer AOHAPPY2  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 00:58
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
1-Core 5.9
2-Core 10.2
4% 8.05 Pts
4-Core 15.1
8-Core 25.2
3% 20.2 Pts
64-Core 30.5
2% 30.5 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$19
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 44 40 44 44 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13% Very poor
Read 109
Write 68.2
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 44.2
17% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 2.6
12% 4.63 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 41.5
36% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 13%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4E54324743363442383842304E532D4347 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.22% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 456
9% 456 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 10%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback