Asus Q505UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus Q505UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q505UAR
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 00:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 562
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1B00) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 7.87
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.5
6% 8.83 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 15.7
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 981 605 395 396 406 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 994
Write 776
Mixed 748
SusWrite 532
171% 763 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 88
300% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 1,015
DQ Mixed 1,024
765% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 210%
Great: 302%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 120 121 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 109
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 120
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
207% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
USB3.0 1TB
134GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 177 179 178 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 113
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 176
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 102%
Multiple Card Reader 4GB
4GB free, PID 6366, Toshiba SDHC SD Card
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Read 16
Write 6.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 6.7
10% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.1
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q505UAR Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q505UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback