Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 23:12
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7800X-$440
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
1-Core 134
2-Core 249
91% 192 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 801
82% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,078
72% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$346
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 329
Reflection 307
Parallax 332
86% 323 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 305
Splatting 239
83% 250 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 86%
AMD HD 5770
PwrHis(1787 2288) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Lighting 46
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 41.7
12% 39 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 29.5
9% 29.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 117 166 125 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 364
Write 164
Mixed 225
SusWrite 127
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 30.2
111% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 18.1
56% 122 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$35
76GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 166 166 166 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 166
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$73
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 149 149 150 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 73.5
Write 121
Mixed 68
SusWrite 150
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
44.8% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 12.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 3,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,279
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback