| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Gigabyte A320M-S2H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190506 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 02 '19 at 17:59 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68%
Good
|
71% 124 Pts
|
55% 464 Pts
|
36% 590 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68.5%
Good
|
74% 81.1 fps
|
58% 70.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 396 417 435 425 347 MB/s
|
93%
Outstanding
|
92% 410 MB/s
|
116% 41.9 MB/s
|
173% 276 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HTS547550A9E 500GB
214GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 33 34 33 MB/s
|
16%
Very poor
|
43% 31.6 MB/s
|
63% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 MB/s
|
0.57%
Terrible
|
2% 1.77 MB/s
|
0% 0 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.7%
Average
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
45% 88.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,633 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 816x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 783x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 742x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 772x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 447x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 413x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $423 |