| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Dell Studio XPS 435MT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0R849J |
| Memory | 6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090505 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 02 '19 at 17:54 |
| Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.6%
Above average
|
49% 74.9 Pts
|
32% 266 Pts
|
22% 347 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
|
21.7%
Poor
|
21% 28.6 fps
|
23% 27.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41% 183 MB/s
|
92% 29.6 MB/s
|
31% 42.8 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 42 40 42 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
31% 42.3 MB/s
|
133% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 42 40 42 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
59% 80.5 MB/s
|
172% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
6GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.3 4.6 MB/s
|
7.65%
Terrible
|
9% 8.3 MB/s
|
126% 2.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
40.7%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
22% 7.83 GB/s
|
52% 77.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 268x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 18x |
| Xeon W3580IntelBench 72%, 653 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 17x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
| Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $199 |