Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090505
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 17:54
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-920-$259
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.6% Below average
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 91.5
32% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 339
32% 258 Pts
64-Core 341
23% 341 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 98.5
20% 84 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 71.3
20% 66.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$60
7GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 165
Write 208
Mixed 178
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 28.6
92% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 39.6
31% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 123%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 42 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 51
Write 48.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 36.9
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 42 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 37.7
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
6GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.3 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 17
Write 3.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.4
9% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.2
126% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 1,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $319
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback