Asrock X299 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
16 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 17:25
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$440
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 85
1-Core 139
2-Core 268
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 849
89% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,095
74% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$267
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 66.4
65% 74.1 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 73.9
42% 72 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 64%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 593 241 234 234 231 222 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,827
Write 1,443
Mixed 629
SusWrite 293
232% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 49.6
222% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1051
DQ Write 1,059
DQ Mixed 702
625% 937 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 204%
Great: 234%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
10GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 69 63 68 68 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 184
Write 110
Mixed 120
SusWrite 70.8
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 19.1
72% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 71.4
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 43.2
35% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3750840AS 750GB
326GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 71 70 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
40% Average
Read 69.4
Write 40.6
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 70
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40%
Great: 42%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$74
173GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 70
Write 45.8
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 75.1
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$136
4TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 255 219 235 241 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 157
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 232
121% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.3
165% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 135%
Great: 107%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE-2 32GB
23GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 143
Write 77
Mixed 85.9
119% 102 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3
203% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 56%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 61.1
MC Mixed 31.1
114% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 11
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 100%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X299 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,083
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback