Asus X555YA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus X555YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555YA
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 13:26
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
27.7% Poor
1-Core 43
2-Core 85.5
30% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 153
21% 152 Pts
64-Core 151
10% 151 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Asus(1043 1B9D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1601.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 12.3
2% 11.3 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 8.7
2% 7.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$31
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 146 102 102 105 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 431
Write 224
Mixed 308
SusWrite 150
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 28.4
102% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 173
133% 182 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X555YA Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus X555YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $51
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback