Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 21:23
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 129
58% 93 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 384
37% 305 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.3% Good
Lighting 77.8
Reflection 121
Parallax 101
63% 99.6 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 89.2
Splatting 97.2
78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 308 335 371 343 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 385
Mixed 388
SusWrite 330
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 42.7
135% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 230
178% 243 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 121%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$113
953GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 304 330 363 336 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 467
Write 368
Mixed 357
SusWrite 325
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 35.8
119% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 215
159% 208 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 126%
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 394 435 480 444 496 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1160
Write 500
Mixed 586
SusWrite 425
148% 668 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 42.6
146% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 420
291% 356 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 132%
Great: 297%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
136GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 17 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29
Write 26
Mixed 23
SusWrite 15.9
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 103%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 17 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 30
Write 26
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 16
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
172% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback