Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory41.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime14.3 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 13:10
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5930K-$295
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.3% Good
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
72% 153 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 632
63% 501 Pts
64-Core 792
53% 792 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (43 fps cap detected)
13% Very poor
Lighting 44.2
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 42.3
12% 43.8 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 44.8
Splatting 39.7
13% 42.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 15%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$230
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 215 221 218 243 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 426
Mixed 360
SusWrite 225
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 39.8
136% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$270
558GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 246 254 249 201 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 422
Mixed 362
SusWrite 226
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 45
148% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 258
213% 305 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94%
Great: 126%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
681GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 415 428 420 461 452 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,066
Write 755
Mixed 500
SusWrite 432
153% 688 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 41
136% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 336
271% 381 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 129%
Great: 411%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 124 119 123 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 108
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 85%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$135
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 171 172 171 179 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 187
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 172
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 43.1
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 22.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 120%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 4,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $1,286
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback