HP EliteBook 745 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83D5
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 10:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 212
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 527
57% 453 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 83D5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.50.30
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 14.4
10% 12 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 13
Splatting 13
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0T14
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 339
Mixed 362
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 25.7
86% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 260
190% 246 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G5 Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback