Samsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E4E-A03SA
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121225
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '19 at 07:28
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	49%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 82.8 1-Core 49.2 2-Core 73.7 47% 68.6 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 155 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.08 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.48 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 371 310 295 316 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 382 Write 444 Mixed 374 SusWrite 328 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 35.8 108% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 343 263% 358 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 372GB free Firmware: AX002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 111 105 103 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 106 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 107 63% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 13.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	28x
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	14x
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	35x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	17x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	3x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	2x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	6x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	5x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5773EB0-CK0 6GBSamsungBench 42%, 624 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16