Samsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E4E-A03SA
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 07:28
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 49%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3210M-$230
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.4% Poor
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 80.7
27% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 155
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 160
11% 160 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 14
Parallax 8.9
3% 11.7 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 17.2
2% 11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$55
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 371 310 295 316 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 382
Write 444
Mixed 374
SusWrite 328
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 35.8
108% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 343
263% 358 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 127%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$19
372GB free
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 111 105 103 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 107
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 13.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $169
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback