Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 05:59
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6500-$185
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56.9% Above average
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 193
68% 145 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 382
43% 330 Pts
64-Core 402
27% 402 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 844D) 1GB
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 69.3
14% 54.2 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 35.4
17% 48.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 413 425 431 447 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 314
Write 346
Mixed 69
SusWrite 428
209% 289 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.7
344% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 213%
Great: 212%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB
5GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.2 2.5 3.5 5.7 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Read 11
Write 6
Mixed 7
SusWrite 3.9
9% 6.97 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.2
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,711 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $880
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $631SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback