Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime20.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 12:23
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 124
56% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 409
38% 318 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 50
34% 40.5 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 36.7
29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 230 289 260 245 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 336
Write 330
Mixed 263
SusWrite 250
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 30.3
105% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 65.2
98% 184 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 104%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
96GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 83 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 53
Write 58.5
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 83.8
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
346GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 82.9
Write 87.9
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 83.6
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback