Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 12:04
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 793
80% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 94.3
Parallax 74
74% 86.4 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 92.8
Splatting 97.4
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1484 1371 1290 1310 1266 1257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,164
Write 1,457
Mixed 852
SusWrite 1,330
323% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 61.2
246% 99.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,217
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,016
792% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 293%
Great: 353%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
788GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 165 171 165 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 113
SusWrite 166
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97%
Great: 108%
WD 1600BEV External 160GB
118GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 42 40 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 36.4
Write 37.2
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 40.5
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 20%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB
810GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 108 105 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 144
Write 100
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 105
139% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
295% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 19
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 12.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback