PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 17 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150601 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 31 '19 at 11:13 |
Run Duration | 226 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2
|
||||
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
83GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 215 203 201 200 184 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
49GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 78 86 87 89 88 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
444GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 82 82 82 79 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
57GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
54GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 18 17 17 10 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
102GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.4 1.7 MB/s
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ F3-14900CL9-4 KHX1866C10D3/ F3-14900CL9-4 24GB
933, 800, 933, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 940x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 854x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 395x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 279x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 180x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 159x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $366 |