Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 259
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 520
68% 512 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 55.5
34% 42.2 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 36.5
29% 35 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,090
Write 6,748
Mixed 7,022
1,623% 7,287 MB/s
4K Read 1,159
4K Write 264
4K Mixed 423
2,438% 615 MB/s
DQ Read 2,758
DQ Write 1,651
DQ Mixed 2,053
1,570% 2,154 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
39GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 294 308 295 286 276 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 490
Mixed 392
SusWrite 314
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 52.9
193% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 153
122% 176 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
20GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 389
Write 76.7
Mixed 127
SusWrite 74.9
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 38.6
143% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 78.5
63% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 23.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback