Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '19 at 10:08
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 155 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 206 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.2 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.9% Average	Lighting 57.3 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 75.8 47% 63.8 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 64.3 Splatting 52.8 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 149 156 158 162 159 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.1% Poor	Read 167 Write 95.3 Mixed 78 SusWrite 154 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 9.3 40% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 31.1 DQ Mixed 30.1 21% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA3FD SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 114 113 115 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 109 Write 117 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 114 73% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT25664BA1339.C8F ID:02 FE EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F ID:83 0B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 44GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.5% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.9 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16