Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '19 at 01:24
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$200 109,729 User benchmarks, average bench 75% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 211 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 718 64% 525 Pts	64-Core 922 62% 922 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$267 956,584 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.5% Above average	Lighting 225 Reflection 195 Parallax 208 59% 209 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 207 Splatting 163 57% 172 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 61%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Eaget S300L SSD 120GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.10 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 440 Write 366 Mixed 284 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 11.2 88% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 82.7 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 18 52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 63%
Eaget S500 SSD 128GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 58GB free Firmware: Q1115A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 502 Write 433 Mixed 370 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 23.8 133% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 32.4 80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 97%
PNY CS900 240GB-$27 27,308 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 110GB free Firmware: CS900812 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 431 Write 292 Mixed 287 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 93.2 4K Mixed 40 155% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 218 189% 279 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 97%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 49,875 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: SBK2 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 64.7 Write 112 Mixed 66.3 60% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 212% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 69%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 19,861 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 115 Write 136 Mixed 56.3 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$43 20,662 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 408GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 67.5 Write 55.7 Mixed 38.5 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$39 342,289 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 446GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 112 Write 103 Mixed 73.5 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 9,554 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 32.1 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.8 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 27.8 82% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $199Bench 72%, 282,071 samples	74x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $320Bench 72%, 144,850 samples	70x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $200Bench 75%, 109,729 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $540Bench 102%, 770,090 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $415Bench 78%, 913,064 samples	51x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $267Bench 57%, 956,584 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $135Bench 111%, 511,546 samples	24x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $85Bench 104%, 699,388 samples	22x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 100%, 19,375 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $66Bench 85%, 303,832 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $64Bench 83%, 388,993 samples	17x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 83,490 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $300	Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K3

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)