| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A1 |
| Memory | 18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130920 |
| Uptime | 14.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 30 '19 at 13:09 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | ALB-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
73%
Very good
|
68% 117 Pts
|
54% 444 Pts
|
78% 1,258 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 386.1
|
5.41%
Terrible
|
0% 4.95 fps
|
15% 18.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PA08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 70 66 74 82 MB/s
|
43.3%
Average
|
50% 67.9 MB/s
|
154% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.7%
Above average
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
24% 8.53 GB/s
|
54% 74.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R920 POWER Builds (Compare 9 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples | 2x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 2x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 2x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 1x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $130 |