Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151223
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 22:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 127
55% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 63.3
58% 68.9 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 67
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 229 60 59 57 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 435
Write 398
Mixed 312
SusWrite 132
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 42.8
147% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 55.5
47% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
335GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 118
Write 113
Mixed 70
SusWrite 115
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
878GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 185 178 183 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 192
Mixed 136
SusWrite 182
130% 176 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 15.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback